A couple weeks ago, the LessWrong team threw a 400-person festival called LessOnline for rationalist-adjacent bloggers and their readers. The festival featured a puzzle hunt, which I helped write!
The puzzle hunt had two rounds with a somewhat unusual structure: all participants who completed the first round were thrown onto one team to solve the (much harder) puzzles in the second round. There was also a really well-crafted and elaborate plot line (that I played no part in creating), which you can read about here.
I wrote two puzzles for the hunt: one for the first round and one for the second. Each of these puzzles opened a 5-letter lock, which means that the answer to both puzzles is 5 letters long (but isn’t necessarily a word). Standard puzzle hunt rules apply: feel free to Google things, ask ChatGPT, etc.
The first puzzle
On the subjective difficulty scale I’ve used before on this blog, the first puzzle is a 3/10. If you’re an experienced puzzle solver, you can probably solve it in about 15 minutes. If you’re not, it might take a while. The puzzle is below; I wrote up the solution here.
A blind game of Projective Set
The second puzzle
On my subjective difficulty scale, this one’s a 6/10. It would probably take an experienced puzzle solver a few hours. The puzzle consists of 50 plastic tiles, but unfortunately I can only provide a soft copy here. If you want to work on this puzzle, I recommend printing and cutting out the pieces. The puzzle is below, and also available as a PDF here. I wrote up the solution here.
Odd ones out
4 (/6)
1 (/6)
8 (/8)
1 (/6)
2 (/10)
Unexpected Values 
When you hear about events like this I would really appreciate it if you mentioned something here before they happen so that your readers can participate
LikeLike
This year’s LessOnline is coming up, if you want to come! You can buy a ticket here.
LikeLiked by 1 person